
FORCED
INDUCTION
TECHNICAL
MANUAL
Copyright
Thunderhawk Performance, Inc., 2007

Avon Lake,
Ohio
Phone:
(216) 965-4800
www.thunderhawkperformance.com

FORCED INDUCTION TODAY
Forced
induction has become increasingly popular over the past 20 years, and is the
top choice among hot-rodders and racers to significantly increase the
horsepower output for today’s high-performance cars. Factory stock Mustangs, Camaros and Corvettes continuously get
faster year after year, but the addition of an intercooled turbocharger system
can catapult these cars into the “supercar” category. The advent of computer controlled fuel injection on
automobiles in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s was primarily responsible for
bringing turbocharging and supercharging into practical use on daily-driven
vehicles. By comparison, anyone who has
experienced a carbureted turbo car can testify that the results were….well,
less than spectacular.
With
fuel injection now coming as standard equipment on newer ATV’s and utility
vehicles (UTV’s), forced induction is now positioned to become the top choice
to reliably increase horsepower for UTV’s while retaining the drivability required
for everyday use. The days of
temperamental carburetors, engine tear-downs to replace internal parts and
constantly making trips to buy race fuel at $7-$8 per gallon are over.
All
turbochargers and superchargers function in the same manner to increase
horsepower. By compressing the air
entering the engine, more oxygen molecules are supplied to the engine without
the need to increase displacement with big-bore kits or strokers. When the corresponding correct proportion of
fuel is delivered to the forced induction engine, a significant horsepower
improvement will be realized which cannot be accomplished by any other
means. In purpose-built turbocharged
race engines, a 150 to 300% horsepower increase can be accomplished. For daily-use vehicles, engines are
typically tuned to achieve a 50 to 100% horsepower increase.
There are different types of
compressors currently being used in mass produced forced induction kits. Each compressor has its advantages and
disadvantages, and each will increase horsepower to varying degrees. There are also parasitic losses to consider
when deciding on a type of compressor.
Other major components in a forced induction kit are also necessary,
such as intercooler, fuel systems and engine management, and should be carefully
considered as well. The primary factors which should be taken into
consideration when deciding on a forced induction system are:
1.
Compressor
Type – boost curve and airflow capacity
2.
Intercooler –
type and efficiency
3.
Fuel System –
adequate fuel flow and proper fuel management
Thunderhawk Performance has published this FORCED INDUCTION TECH MANUAL in order to provide a basic overview of the technical aspects involved in
the design of a properly engineered forced induction system. Just as we witnessed in the 1990's in the high-performance
automotive market, you are going to find many poorly designed turbo and
supercharger systems being rushed into the UTV market simply to fill consumer
demand. Many of these systems will
feature major design flaws that the customer ends up paying for in poor
performance, drivability and reliability.
Since we've been involved in the design and manufacturing of forced
induction systems for over 15 years, we've seen this whole episode play out
before. This is why we've updated our FORCED INDUCTION TECH MANUAL
and published it - for a whole new generation of horsepower junkies, and their
UTV's.

TURBOCHARGER AND SUPERCHARGER COMPRESSORS
EFFICIENCY
The centrifugal supercharger and the turbocharger
are the most common types of compressors currently available in forced
induction kits designed for installation on high-performance engines.
Any time air is compressed, the temperature of the
air will be increased. This phenomenon
can be described by Boyle’s Law, and is a basic part of every physics
course. By using Boyle’s Law, the theoretical
temperature increase can be calculated for a perfect situation (100% efficiency). Since no man-made compressor is 100%
efficient, an adjustment must be made to reflect the actual conditions. This is known as adiabatic efficiency, and
typically runs between 50% and 80% for these compressors. In addition, the actual “real world”
efficiency varies with outside air temperature, flow and pressure, meaning that
some averaging is required. The
efficiency of the compressor directly affects the temperature of the air charge
(boost), which can affect net horsepower by 10 to 50%.
BOOST CURVES
One consideration for any daily-use vehicle is the
fact that any type of compressor you choose will spend a majority of the time
working against partially or even fully closed throttle plates (cruising or
decelerating) and operating at relatively low engine RPM’s.
Centrifugal superchargers are driven by a belt in
direct proportion to engine RPM.
Therefore, these superchargers tend to have a rather poor boost curve,
with advertised boost being produced only at peak RPM. If a supercharger manufacturer selects
pulleys that produce 10 PSI boost at 7000 RPM’s, then this supercharger will
produce only 5 PSI boost at 3500 RPM’s and approximately 7 PSI boost at 5000
RPM’s. This centrifugal boost curve
(supercharger lag) leaves the average driver without the full benefit of forced
induction in many daily-use circumstances.
Turbochargers can produce a very desirable boost
curve, where full boost is available at lower RPM’s. Since the turbocharger’s output (boost) is not directly related
to engine RPM’s, a turbocharger can be selected to produce full boost (for
example, 10 PSI) at 2500-3500 RPM’s.
Once full boost is achieved, the turbochargers wastegate bypasses
exhaust energy past the turbine wheel, thereby limiting boost to the pre-set 10
PSI all the way up to the engines redline.
This low RPM boost produces much greater torque and horsepower in normal
daily-driving situations, which is the useable power and torque that you feel
when you “punch it”.
PARASITIC LOSSES
Many factors affect the final horsepower output
available to drive the wheels. The
method used to drive the compressor has a significant effect on the horsepower
delivered to the ground. Superchargers
are driven by the engine’s crankshaft via a V-rib or cogged belt. The horsepower required to actually turn the
supercharger is therefore produced by the engine and then lost to this
parasitic horsepower draw. Most
automotive street-type superchargers (Vortech, Paxton, etc.) require 30 to 50
horsepower to drive at peak boost. The
smaller superchargers used on UTV’s require 12 to 20 horsepower to drive at
peak boost.
This parasitic horsepower loss with superchargers
has a “domino effect” on the vehicle set-up and tuning. The fuel system must supply sufficient fuel
to support the total horsepower produced by the engine, which includes the
parasitic drive losses, in addition to the horsepower which is actually
delivered to the wheels. This taxes the
fuel system and aggravates drivability issues as larger fuel pumps and
injectors are required. The production
of horsepower lost to the parasitic drive of the supercharger also places
additional demand on the engine, including increased load on the pistons,
crankshaft and rods, thereby shortening engine life.
Turbochargers are driven by the engine’s exhaust gas
via a turbine wheel placed in the exhaust tract. Although it would appear that the exhaust gas movement drives the
turbine like a fan, the turbine is actually driven by the heat energy in the
exhaust. Even though the exhaust
temperature at the engine is the same as any forced induction engine, a well
designed turbo installation will result in a 300 degree temperature drop across
the turbine wheel as this heat energy is used to drive the turbo. This heat energy would otherwise be wasted
to the atmosphere through the exhaust system.
With properly engineered turbine sizing, engine pumping losses (exhaust
back pressure) at wide-open throttle are insignificant.
SUPERCHARGER DRIVE
BELTS
The belt drive used on a supercharger is susceptible
to slippage and failure. Supercharger
belt slippage is common, as illustrated by the use of extra wide V-rib belts on
high-boost street applications and cog tooth belts on high performance racing
applications. Unfortunately, cog tooth
belts are not practical for daily, extended use. The most common causes of belt slippage for a standard V-rib
supercharger drive belt are small diameter pulleys, higher boost levels and
improper belt adjustment & maintenance.
Belts and pulleys can also be damaged by small debris that causes
abrasive wear on the contact surfaces between the belt and pulleys. This abrasive wear causes belt slippage
rather quickly and can also lead to thrown belts. If large debris manages to contact the belt or get lodged between
the belt and pulley, this will cause immediate belt failure, pulley damage and
could possibly damage the supercharger shaft and bearings.
Supercharger drive belt performance and reliability
is a major concern for UTV’s, due to the exposed supercharger drive belt in the
off-road environment. Although dust
does not contribute significantly to abrasive belt and pulley wear, small
particle contamination (such as sand) does cause significant abrasive
damage. Without a sealed belt enclosure
to protect the supercharger drive belt, a UTV should be restricted from
traveling anywhere that the belt may be exposed to water, sand or mud, or where
sticks, rocks or any other large debris may come in contact with the belt.
TURBO HEAT
A common misconception surrounding turbochargers is
that they “build” or “create” heat.
Turbochargers do not “create” heat, they use the exhaust heat which is
created by the engine, through the combustion process. Exhaust gas temperatures from a gasoline
engine exceed 1000 degrees, and this heat is directed away from the vehicle
through the exhaust system. For a
naturally aspirated or supercharged engine, this exhaust heat travels from the
cylinder head exhaust port, through the header and is then discharged to the
atmosphere through the muffler. For
turbocharged engines, this same exhaust heat travels from the cylinder head
exhaust port, through the header, then passes through the turbocharger turbine
housing before it exits through the muffler.
Despite the fact that turbos do not create heat, the
problems associated with turbocharger heat are very real. Although this reputation is not justified,
turbo systems have all been branded as having heat problems. This reputation is based on the fact that
there have been many turbo kits over the years which were not properly designed
to address exhaust heat issues, causing major turbo heat problems for their
owners.
On stock vehicles, the manufacturer has designed the
exhaust system so that exhaust heat is routed away from heat sensitive
components and has provided heat shielding to protect any items that are
located near the exhaust heat. Modified
naturally aspirated engines and supercharged engines benefit from these factory
designs, since they retain the stock exhaust system. Aftermarket headers and exhaust systems frequently re-route the
exhaust system to improve flow, which is known to cause heat issues in many
cases. With a turbocharger system, the
exhaust system must also be re-routed.
Correct turbo placement, proper exhaust routing and adequate heat
shielding are proven to eliminate turbo-related heat problems.
AIRFLOW CAPACITY
The airflow capacity of each compressor is another
issue altogether. Airflow capacity is
the measurement of the maximum amount of air that a certain compressor is
capable of flowing at a given efficiency.
This number is usually measured in lbs/min (mass), but certain companies
use CFM (volume). When airflow is
measured in CFM, an adjustment must be made for air temperature. The same mass (lbs/min) will increase in
volume (CFM) due to the temperature increase created by compressing the air
(Boyle’s Law, see Appendix). This
causes the advertised CFM to increase, although no additional air is available
for the engine to consume. In order to
calculate this temperature increase, the compressor efficiency must be known.
Today’s centrifugal automotive street-type
superchargers have adequate airflow capacity to produce up to 650 horsepower at
between 60 and 70% efficiency with the typical centrifugal boost curve. Race-type automotive centrifugal
superchargers can exceed 1500 horsepower at 60% efficiency, although their
boost curve is much poorer. Today’s
single turbo automotive kits have adequate airflow to produce up to 1000
horsepower; however, turbo lag is still a significant problem with these big
turbos.
The centrifugal supercharger, which is commonly used
for UTV applications has adequate airflow capacity to deliver up to 110-115
horsepower at 71% efficiency with the typical centrifugal boost curve. The turbocharger used by Thunderhawk
Performance in our UTV turbo systems can deliver up to 130 horsepower at 76%
efficiency, without significant turbo lag.
The choice of a particular type of compressor comes
down to two basic questions:
1.
What is the
lowest engine RPM at which the compressor develops maximum boost?
2.
Does the
compressor have sufficient airflow capacity to supply the maximum horsepower
level you require?

INTERCOOLING
INTERCOOLER FUNCTION
Intercoolers have only recently been
getting the attention they deserve.
Whether called an intercooler or aftercooler, their function is the
same. The air charge (boost) exiting
the compressor is cooled (and condensed) and it passes through the intercooler
core. This increases horsepower
directly through the decrease in air charge temperature, and also allows your
engine to be tuned for a further increase in horsepower due to the decreased
temperature and lowered chance of detonation.
Intercoolers eliminate the need to run expensive race fuel in most
applications.
IS INTERCOOLING REQUIRED?
The most common question about intercoolers is “Do I
need an intercooler?” An intercooler is
strongly recommended for all forced induction systems (supercharger and turbo),
but is not absolutely required below 5 PSI boost. Above 5 PSI boost, an intercooler should be considered a
requirement. Even the mildest forced
induction kits will experience a significant increase in air charge temperature
at the boost levels at which they are sold.
Using Boyle’s Law (see Appendix), we can calculate that 7.5 PSI boost
will increase the air charge temperature by 90 to 100 degrees (at 70%
compressor efficiency). By utilizing an
80% efficient intercooler, we can reduce this elevated air charge temperature
by 72 to 80 degrees, delivering air to the engine that is only 18 to 20 degrees
above the ambient outside air temperature.
The reduction in the air charge temperature from intercooling can
produce a 10 to 20% increase in horsepower over a non-intercooled engine and
significantly reduce the risk of detonation.
Although any intercooler will provide some level of
improvement, a properly designed and manufactured intercooler must be correctly
sized with respect to the engine’s inlet airflow and compressor
efficiency. Obviously, as the boost
levels rise, an intercooler changes from a useful option to an essential
component.
There are two basic types of
intercoolers available: air-to-water and air-to-air. Each type is described below. As with most aspects of mechanical
engineering, both styles have advantages and disadvantages; but the final
decision is usually made by vehicle application & usage and by weight &
reliability considerations.
To properly design and manufacture
an intercooler system, many factors must be considered: the intercooler core dimensions, flow
characteristics, internal and external fin specifications, intercooler core
construction and end tank design. This
is not a simple exercise. Intercoolers
are rated by their efficiency. A
well-designed intercooler will approach 90% efficiency. When a system is designed with a proper
intercooler, a 10 to 20% increase in horsepower is possible at boost levels as
low as 7.5 PSI. In racing applications
with boost levels exceeding 25+ PSI, an efficient intercooler can provide a 30
to 35% increase in horsepower.
COMMON INTERCOOLER MISCONCEPTIONS
People commonly confuse air charge
(boost) temperature with engine coolant temperature. I guess this is understandable, as we are all trained from age 16
to watch the “engine temp” gauge in our cars.
Of course, this gauge is measuring engine coolant temperature, and we
all know it’s bad news if this gauge is pegged. When discussing a forced induction system and intercoolers, we
are not concerned with engine coolant temperature. Our discussions revolve around air charge (boost)
temperature. This is the temperature of
the air entering your engine. On the
station wagon you drove at age 16, the air charge temperature was whatever the
outside temperature was on any give day.
With forced induction, the air charge temperature is increased during
compression and this elevated air charge (boost) temperature is what an
intercooler reduces. Keep in mind that
engine coolant and air charge (boost) temperatures are independent of each
other. I cringe whenever I hear the
owner of a non-intercooled supercharger or turbo say “I don’t need an
intercooler, I never overheat”. This is
the guy that inevitably turns up his boost and blows the engine; all the time
blaming the turbocharger and not the poor design of the turbo system and lack
of intercooling.
Air-to-water intercoolers utilize
water as the medium to remove heat from the charge air. The intercooler core must be placed in a
custom housing located between the compressor outlet and the engine. For daily-use, a second heat exchanger, located
in the vehicles airstream, is required to transfer the heat accumulated by the
intercooler water to the outside air.
Air-to-water intercoolers require an intercooler core with properly
designed end tanks and a second heat exchanger, plus coolant reservoirs, water
pump and fluid transfer hoses which are required to circulate water through the
system. Following are the advantages
and disadvantages of choosing an air-to-water intercooler:
·
Easier to
design –
Intercooler location is not dictated by outside airflow. The heat exchanger installs easily in available
space near the engine, with only small fluid transfer hose connections
required.
·
Lower
charge temperature – When using ice water, in a pure race environment, the air charge
temperature can be lowered below outside air temperature (with a large enough
intercooler). However, this is true
ONLY when ice water is used.
·
Expensive – Due to the large number
of components required.
·
Heavy – Due to the large number
of components and the large volume of water that must be carried (typically 2
to 5 gallons, at 8 pounds per gallon).
·
Less
efficient
– Heat must be transferred twice. If
both intercooler and heat exchanger are 80% efficient, system efficiency is
only 64% (.80 x .80 = .64). The heat
exchanger commonly used in production kits resembles a standard oil cooler, and
this design is nowhere near 80% efficient.
·
Core
rupture –
Damage or corrosion to the core may cause a leak, which can fill the engines
combustion chamber with water and cause severe engine damage.
·
Ice Melts – Ice water is only
practical for use in drag racing and the ice must be replaced after every run
to maintain consistent air charge temperatures. For extended periods of operation, such as in daily-use, the
intercooler water temperature stabilizes at a relatively high temperature, due
to the poor intercooler system efficiency.
This heat-soak provides less air charge temperature reduction.
·
Fluid
System Failure – If for any reason (e.g., hose or pump failure) your air-to-water
intercooler runs dry, or water circulation stops, practically no cooling effect
will take place. An engine which is
tuned and optimized for use with an intercooler will detonate and may be damaged
without intercooling.
Air-to-water intercoolers are high-maintenance race
components. Their use is limited
primarily to automotive drag racing.
Air-to water intercoolers are not suitable for use in a rough environment,
such as found in off-road UTV applications.
There are two types of air-to-air
intercooler cores in use today.
Bar-and-plate cores feature heavy-duty construction and are highly
efficient. Tube-and-fin cores are
constructed similar to a car’s radiator; they are rather fragile and are far
less efficient than a similar sized bar-and-plate intercooler core. Bar-and-plate intercooler cores are used
almost exclusively in any automotive application, even low boost vehicles. Tube-and-fin cores are used primarily in
industrial cooling systems and should be avoided.
Air-to-air intercoolers utilize outside air as the
medium to remove heat from the charge air (boost) and therefore require that
the intercooler be placed in the path of unrestricted outside air. An air-to-air intercooler installation
requires a properly sized and designed intercooler, as well as properly sized
ducting from the compressor to the intercooler, and from the intercooler to the
engine. Outside air must also be
directed to the intercooler to enable the system to effectively transfer
heat. Following are the advantages and
disadvantages of choosing an air-to-air intercooler:
· Highest Efficiency – Results in lowest possible stabilized air charge temperature
(assuming properly sized/designed intercooler).
· Less Weight
– No additional components or water to carry.
· Will not cause engine damage – No water to leak into engine.
· System failure eliminated – No additional components to fail, causing high air
charge temperatures and detonation.
· Sufficient outside airflow necessary for proper
cooling – Intercooler mounting position
can cause design difficulties, many variables must be considered when choosing
intercooler location. Fan assistance
beneficial in situations with reduced outside air movement.
· Difficult to design – Sound engineering knowledge is required to design and manufacture a
low restriction, high-efficiency air-to-air intercooler. Properly sized air ducting, to provide
adequate airflow for the engine’s horsepower, must be designed to fit properly
and clear all components.
Air-to-air intercoolers provide the
greatest efficiency under a wide range of circumstances, the highest level of
reliability and the lowest weight.
For quick reference, air
charge temperatures have been calculated below at various efficiencies and
boost levels. These tables have been
prepared for both non-intercooled and intercooled applications to illustrate
the dramatic differences in air charge (boost) temperature. These two tables can also be used to compare
air charge (boost) temperatures before and after the intercooler.
Non-Intercooled
Air Charge (Boost) Temperature
85°
(F) Ambient Air
|
|
|
Boost Pressure |
|||||||
|
|
|
2.5 PSI |
5.0 PSI |
7.5 PSI |
10.0 PSI |
12.5 PSI |
15.0 PSI |
17.5 PSI |
20.0 PSI |
|
Compressor Efficiency |
100% |
110° |
132° |
152° |
171° |
189° |
205° |
220° |
235° |
|
90% |
113° |
137° |
161° |
181° |
201° |
218° |
235° |
252° |
|
|
80% |
116° |
144° |
170° |
193° |
215° |
235° |
254° |
273° |
|
|
70% |
121° |
152° |
181° |
208° |
234° |
256° |
278° |
299° |
|
|
60% |
127° |
163° |
198° |
228° |
258° |
285° |
310° |
335° |
|
|
50% |
135° |
179° |
221° |
257° |
293° |
325° |
355° |
385° |
|
Intercooled
Air Charge (Boost) Temperature
85°
(F) Ambient Air
80% Efficient Intercooler
|
|
|
Boost Pressure |
|||||||
|
|
|
2.5 PSI |
5.0 PSI |
7.5 PSI |
10.0 PSI |
12.5 PSI |
15.0 PSI |
17.5 PSI |
20.0 PSI |
|
Compressor Efficiency |
100% |
90° |
94° |
98° |
102° |
106° |
109° |
112° |
115° |
|
90% |
91° |
95° |
100° |
104° |
108° |
111° |
115° |
118° |
|
|
80% |
91° |
97° |
102° |
107° |
111° |
115° |
118° |
122° |
|
|
70% |
92° |
98° |
104° |
110° |
115° |
119° |
123° |
127° |
|
|
60% |
93° |
100° |
107° |
114° |
119° |
125° |
130° |
135° |
|
|
50% |
95° |
104° |
112° |
119° |
126° |
133° |
139° |
145° |
|

It should be common knowledge that
the increased horsepower produced by any engine will require an increase in
fuel delivery to the engine. This increased
fuel delivery may require upgrading just one or literally all of the fuel
system components in the stock fuel system.
There are various methods of achieving the necessary increase in fuel
flow through each fuel system component; these methods are discussed
below. The only way to determine which
fuel system components are sufficient and which will require upgrades, is to
test all components in the system.
Manufacturer design and flow data is necessary, with a fuel system flow
bench commonly used to generate flow data for the complete fuel system.
Stock
______________________________________________________________________
Fuel Filter Larger
filter element
Improved
connector design
Fuel
Pump Increase
volume (new pump)
Increase
voltage to pump
Decrease
fuel pressure (reduces injector flow)
Fuel Lines Larger
diameter fuel line
Fuel
Rails Larger
diameter fuel rails
Improved
connector design
Fuel Injectors Increase
fuel pressure (reduces pump flow)
Install
larger injectors
Install
auxiliary injectors
Fuel Pressure Regulator Install larger regulator
The filtration of an EFI fuel system is particularly important. Unfortunately, the more effective the filter
is, the more it restricts fuel flow.
The only practical way to exceed a fuel filter flow limitation is to
install a larger filter or multiple filters (in parallel). If appropriate care is taken with regard to
the quality of the filter element employed, and the proper installation
plumbing is used, either approach is acceptable.
In order to supply a specific horsepower requirement, a sufficient
volume of fuel must be delivered by the fuel pump. The electric fuel pumps used in fuel injection systems all have a
number of design characteristics in common.
1.
The fuel pump’s rated output volume
capacity applies only at the stated design pressure.
2.
If the fuel pressure is increased, the
fuel pump output volume will decrease.
3.
If the electric supply voltage is
increased, fuel pump output volume will increase. However, beyond a certain voltage (usually 13.5 volts), pump life
rapidly decreases.
Fuel lines are only capable of supplying a certain
limited volume of fuel, due to their diameter.
To exceed this limit, larger diameter fuel lines are required. The following recommendations are
conservative, but can be used with confidence.
The reason for the apparent contradiction of AN- sizing correlating to
tubing I.D. is that the fittings used with the AN- hose assemblies have a
smaller I.D. than the actual AN- hose, which restricts flow.
HP @ 40 PSI Pipe O.D. Pipe
I.D. AN-size
__________________________________________________________________
500 HP 5/16” ¼” AN-5
750 HP 3/8” 5/16” AN-6
1350 HP ½” 7/16” AN-8
Similar to the fuel line situation, the fuel injector
rails must be sized according to the horsepower to be produced. Fuel rails are capable of supplying a certain
limited volume of fuel, due to their volume or to a restrictive supply
orifice. There must always be
sufficient fuel volume in the fuel rail at each injector inlet to ensure that
the injector will not run dry (be exposed to vacuum/vapor in the rail). In racing applications, the fuel rails
should be plumbed in a circular fashion, so that all injectors receive fuel
from both sides. Extra caution should
be taken when two adjacent injectors are required to fire in succession. For reference, a fuel rail with at least
7/16” I.D. and a dual AN-8 feeds should support 1350 horsepower safely.
Increased
fuel injector flow can be achieved by increasing fuel pressure, installing a
larger set of injectors, or by adding auxiliary injectors.
There
are numerous methods available to increase fuel pressure. A fuel management unit (FMU) is used by many
supercharger manufacturers on applications where a return-type fuel system is
used. These FMU’s block off the fuel
return line, thereby increasing fuel pressure.
For non-return type fuel systems, an FMU cannot be used, but there are a
number of ways to increase fuel pressure to the injectors with these systems as
well. If fuel pressure is controlled
through the ECU with a pressure transducer, fuel pressure may be able to be
increased through ECU re-programming.
For a mechanical in-tank pressure regulator system, you may be able to
replace or modify the regulator to provide additional pressure. In some cases, a second fuel pump may be added
after the in-tank pump and regulator which will increase fuel pressure.
When
fuel pressure is increased, fuel volume (through the injector) increases by the
square root of the increase in fuel pressure.
Doubling fuel pressure (example: 40 PSI to 80 PSI) only increases fuel
volume by 41% (√2 = 0.41).
Increased fuel pressure places an additional load on the fuel injector,
since the injector must open against the higher fuel pressure. Fuel pump output volume and fuel pump life
are both significantly decreased when operating at pressures which are greater
than the system design pressure. At
excessive pressures, only the most expensive, race-quality fuel pumps can
operate reliably.
If
a larger set of injectors is installed, the engine control computer (ECU) must
be recalibrated. The injector’s pulse
width signal from the ECU must be reduced to deliver the correct amount of fuel
to the larger injectors under all circumstances. To accomplish this properly, the appropriate sections of the
computer’s internal programming must be accessed and reprogrammed. If significantly larger injectors are used,
the reprogramming may call for excessively small injector pulse widths at idle,
which causes unstable injector operation and creates fuel delivery issues at
idle.
If
auxiliary injectors are installed, they must be correctly positioned and
properly controlled. The injectors must
be positioned to ensure satisfactory fuel distribution into each intake port. These auxiliary injectors will also require
a properly programmed control unit to guarantee that the correct air/fuel ratio
is maintained under all operating conditions.
A properly designed auxiliary injector system allows the fuel pump and
all injectors to operate at their design pressure.

COMMON
QUESTIONS ABOUT THUNDERHAWK UTV TURBO
SYSTEMS
Q. Will the Thunderhawk Performance turbo system produce more
horsepower than other UTV turbos or superchargers?
A. That depends. Compressor flow
(airflow capacity) and compressor efficiency will determine the maximum
horsepower capability of any system.
For UTV applications, the maximum airflow and horsepower capacity of the
turbo used by Thunderhawk Performance is greater than that of the typical UTV
supercharger, by approximately 15%. Any
UTV turbo kits that use larger automotive-type turbochargers will operate very
inefficiently and may experience compressor surge which causes turbocharger
bearing failure when these large turbos are installed on a small displacement
engine, as used in UTV’s. Extensive
engineering and R&D have allowed Thunderhawk Performance to produce a true
daily-use turbo system for UTV’s, which produces maximum horsepower without
significant turbo lag. Our UTV turbo
systems produce superior performance for max-horsepower, wide-open operation as
well as producing greater torque for real-world trail use.
Q. What other parts will I need to purchase when installing the
Thunderhawk Performance turbo system?
A. None. The Thunderhawk
Performance turbo system is a complete engineered system. Thunderhawk Performance does recommend that
a high quality boost gauge and a fuel pressure gauge be mounted in plain sight
of the driver to monitor these important systems. If you wish to increase horsepower above the level at which
Thunderhawk delivers our turbo kits, we can advise the best way to accomplish
your goal and recommend what components may need to be upgraded to match your
increased level of performance. We will
continue to run our turbo systems on the dyno and develop upgrades to
accommodate your need for speed.
Q. How long does it take to install the Thunderhawk Performance
turbo system?
A. Typically, one day in a well-equipped garage for someone who has
not installed one previously. The fact
that Thunderhawk Performance provides a complete and comprehensive system is
the primary reason that this is more than just an “afternoon and a 6-pack”
job. Thunderhawk Performance includes a
complete installation guide with full installation instructions, diagrams,
photos, recommended tool list and helpful installation tips with every turbo
system.
Q. What type of maintenance does the Thunderhawk Performance turbo
system require?
A. No special maintenance specific to the turbo system is
required. Synthetic engine oil should be
used and changed regularly, along with the oil filter. The recommended spark plugs should be
changed at recommended intervals for optimum performance. Air filter maintenance should be performed
frequently, as any forced induction system or modified race engine will draw
significantly more air than a stock engine.
Thunderhawk Performance has redesigned the complete air inlet system on
the RZR to eliminate the dust ingestion problems common to this vehicle. These air filter upgrades will be available
for stock, naturally aspirated RZR’s in early 2008 as well.
Q. What about turbo bearing failures and “coking”?
A. Turbo “coking” is not a design problem, it is a maintenance
problem. Water cooled turbochargers
significantly reduce this potential problem; however proper maintenance should
not be neglected. Regular oil changes
and idling the engine for approximately 60 seconds before shut down will
practically eliminate “coking” problems.
Q. How will the Thunderhawk turbo system affect drivability?
A. With the Thunderhawk Performance turbo system, drivability will
remain virtually identical to that of stock.
Since a turbocharger does not produce any boost, or create any load on
the engine under light throttle, a properly designed turbo system is
“invisible” to the engine under normal driving conditions. However, system design is important, as we
have seen many improperly designed or incomplete turbo systems create numerous
drivability problems, incorrect fueling, decreased cooling system efficiency,
header failures and many other issues.
With 15 years experience designing and manufacturing turbocharger
systems, Thunderhawk Performance offers the only UTV turbo system capable of
reliable, extended use, under all operating conditions from WOT desert runs to
slow, technical trails.
Q. Does a turbo system increase vehicle noise?
A. No. The exhaust energy
used to drive the turbochargers actually causes a reduction in noise
levels.
Q. Is an intercooler necessary?
A. Absolutely! Any properly
engineered forced induction system producing over 5 PSI boost will include an
intercooler. Practically every O.E.M.
supercharged or turbocharged vehicle manufactured includes an intercooler. The only companies who have claimed that
intercooling is unnecessary, are aftermarket manufacturers and retailers
attempting to market artificially cheap packages by providing only half of the
necessary components.
Q. How will an intercooler assist the engine?
A. By reducing the air charge (boost) temperature, engine power is
increased, the chance of detonation is decreased, and head gasket, piston and
valve life are improved.
Q. So, any intercooler will help?
A. Yes and no. There is much
expertise required in designing an efficient intercooler system, just as there
is in designing any other engine or drivetrain system. Intercooler size and design are
critical. With a correctly designed
intercooler, the boost pressure drop across the intercooler will be
approximately 1 PSI or less, and the air charge temperature at the manifold
will typically be within 30 degrees of the ambient outside air
temperature. A low-efficiency or
undersized intercooler (or one with poor airflow design) may offer some limited
improvement; but the improvement will fall far short of that achieved with a
properly designed intercooler system.
Q. Do I need to change my camshaft before I install a turbo system?
A. No. At lower boost
levels, a stock camshaft can be retained with excellent results. Engines operating at elevated boost levels
(high-boost race engines) will usually benefit from a high-performance
turbo-grind camshaft, although a stock camshaft still works exceptionally well
even at higher boost levels. Please be
aware that most aftermarket high-performance ATV/UTV camshafts have been
designed specifically for use on naturally aspirated engines, and may be a very
poor choice for use on a turbo engine.
Even the so-called “torque” cams should be carefully evaluated before
changing cams. If you feel that it is
necessary to change the camshaft, a custom-ground camshaft designed for the
turbocharged engine combination is recommended.
Q. What is the maximum compression ratio I can use with a turbo
system?
A. Modern engines equipped with aluminum cylinder heads can
typically operate reliably on premium pump gas at moderate boost levels (7-9
PSI) with compression ratios as high as 10:1.
This will vary by engine. If
more boost is going to be employed, lower compression ratios may be required,
depending upon the octane rating of the fuel to be used.
Q. How much horsepower will the Thunderhawk Performance RZR turbo
system add to my engine?
A. We have not yet finalized the production specs for this system. Once we have our pre-production systems
thoroughly tested and the all engine calibrations are finalized, we will
announce this information. Rest
assured, we will deliver a turbo system that is both reliable and fast.

APPENDIX
CALCULATING AIR CHARGE TEMPERATURE
BOYLE’S LAW
q
Boyle’s Law, also known as the Universal
Gas Law, is a basic part of every physics course. This formula allows the effects of pressure, volume or
temperature to be calculated for any gaseous material.
(P1 x V1) / T1
= (P2 x V2) / T2
P = Pressure
V = Volume
T = Temperature
As this formula illustrates, any increase in pressure (P)
will always result in an increase in temperature (T) or a decrease in volume
(V).
q
To calculate the air charge (boost)
temperature discharged from a 100% efficient compressor, use the following
formula:
T2 = T1 x (P2 / P1)0.283
T1 = Inlet temperature (degrees Rankin); ambient
temperature
T2 = Outlet
temperature (degrees Rankin); air charge (boost) temperature
P1 = Inlet
pressure (PSIG); atmospheric
P2 = Outlet
pressure (PSIG); atmospheric + boost
q
To convert between degrees Rankin (R)
and degrees Fahrenheit (F), use the following formulas:
F = R – 460
q
To calculate the ideal temperature
increase (100% efficient compressor) caused by the above pressures increase (in
degrees Fahrenheit), use this formula:
T3 = T2 – T1
T1 = Inlet temperature (degrees F); ambient
temperature
T2 = Outlet temperature (degrees F); air charge
temperature
T3 =
Ideal temperature increase (degrees F); at 100% efficiency
EXAMPLE 1: 85° F inlet temperature, 100% efficient compressor, 7.5
PSI boost
Outlet
temperature T2 =
(85 + 460) x ((7.5 + 14.7) / 14.7)0.283
Outlet
temperature T2 =
(545) x(22.2 / 14.7)0.283
Outlet
temperature T2 =
(545) x (1.5102)0.283
Outlet
temperature T2 =
(545) x (1.1237)
Outlet
temperature T2 =
612 (degress Rankin)
Outlet
temperature T2 =
612 - 460
Outlet
temperature T2 =
152° F
Ideal
temperature increase T3 =
152 – 85
Boyle’s Law allows for the calculation of air charge
temperatures created by a 100% efficient compressor. However, we cannot apply this directly to our forced induction
systems since no man-made compressor is 100% efficient. To calculate the actual air charge
temperature discharged from any given compressor, that particular compressor’s
measured efficiency (adiabatic efficiency) must be known. Adiabatic efficiency varies from 50% to 80%
for the compressors currently available in today’s turbo and supercharger
systems.
q
To calculate the actual temperature
increase created by a particular compressor, use the following formula:
T4 = T3 / AE
T3 = Ideal temperature increase (degrees F); at
100% efficiency
AE = Adiabatic
efficiency
T4 =
Actual temperature increase (degrees F); at adiabatic efficiency
q
To calculate the actual air charge
(boost) temperature discharged from a particular compressor with a known
adiabatic efficiency, use the following formula:
T5 = T4 + T1
T1 = Inlet temperature (degrees F); ambient
temperature
T4 =
Actual temperature increase (degrees F); at adiabatic efficiency
T5 =
Actual air charge temperature (degrees F); at adiabatic efficiency
EXAMPLE 2: 85° F inlet temperature, 70% adiabatic efficiency
(typical supercharger, not intercooled), 7.5 PSIG boost
Actual
temperature increase T4 = 67° F / 0.70
Actual
air charge temperature T5 = 96
+ 85
EXAMPLE 3: 85° F inlet temperature, 76% adiabatic efficiency
(typical performance turbocharger, not intercooled), 7.5 PSIG boost
Actual
temperature increase T4 = 67° F / 0.76
Actual
air charge temperature T5 = 88
+ 85
INTERCOOLER EFFICIENCY
An
intercooler (or aftercooler) is a device designed to remove as much heat as possible
from the air charge (boost) before it enters the engine. As is the case with compressor efficiency,
no man-made heat exchanger (intercooler) is 100% efficient.
Intercooler
efficiency is the measure of the amount of the temperature increase (caused by
the compressor) which is removed from the air charge (boost) before it enters
the engine. For example, an intercooler
which can reduce the air charge temperature by 80° F, in a system which increased the air charge
temperature by 100°
F over ambient (due to the compressor), would be considered 80% efficient.
A
properly designed air-to-air intercooler of sufficient size can achieve
efficiencies approaching 90%. With an
air-to-water intercooler system, two heat exchangers are required as explained in
the text. Therefore, the total system
efficiency is the multiple of both heat exchangers’ individual
efficiencies.
q
To calculate the final air charge
temperature entering the engine with an intercooled forced induction system, use
the following formulas:
T6 = T4 x IE
T4 = Actual temperature increase (degrees F); at
adiabatic efficiency
IE =
Intercooler efficiency
T6 =
Temperature decrease (degrees F); due to intercooling
T7 = T5 – T6
T5 = Actual air charge temperature (degrees F);
at adiabatic efficiency
T6 =
Temperature decrease (degrees F); due to intercooling
T7 =
Final intercooled air charge temperature (degrees F)
EXAMPLE 4: 85° F inlet temperature, 70% adiabatic efficiency, 65%
efficient air-to water intercooler (typical supercharger with liquid
intercooler), 7.5 PSIG boost
Temperature
decrease T6 = 96° F x 0.65
Final
intercooled air charge temperature T7 =
181 – 62
Final
intercooled air charge temperature T7 =
119° F
EXAMPLE 5: 85° F inlet temperature, 76% adiabatic efficiency, 88%
efficient air-to-air intercooler (Thunderhawk Performance intercooled turbo
system), 7.5 PSIG boost
Temperature
decrease T6 = 88° F x 0.88
Final
intercooled air charge temperature T7 =
173 – 77
Final
intercooled air charge temperature T7 = 96° F
CONVERTING CFM TO LBS/MIN AIRFLOW
q
At 85° F and 28.4 in. Hg., CFM can be converted to lbs/min
by using this simple formula:
Lbs/min
= CFM x 0.069
By referring back to Boyle’s Law, it is obvious that the
volume (CFM) will increase with a corresponding increase in air charge
temperature. However, this increase in
CFM provides NO additional air mass.
Therefore, there are no additional oxygen molecules made available to
the engine for combustion, although the volume (CFM) is significantly higher.
Using
CFM as a measure of airflow confuses the calculation due to the wide variations
in temperature, both before and after the compressor, as well as after the
intercooler. All calculations in this
technical manual assume the above conversion standards. However, to accurately compare compressors, the
compressor efficiencies as specified in the compressor flow maps must be known
in order to calculate density and bring all compressors back to this standard.
Copyright
Thunderhawk Performance, Inc., 2007

Avon Lake,
Ohio
Phone:
(216) 965-4800
http://www.thunderhawkperformance.com/
